Lots of people will cry over this, but I think it's only fair. Pluto thinks it's so special just because it was observed and named in 1930. Well fuck pluto! It's just as small and crappy as xena and charon and whatnot. Maybe when 134340 starts pulling its own weight and gets a job it can earn a name!
Well if astrology takes Pluto into consideration they need to take ceres and xena and every last asteroid into consideration with their pseudo-scientific bullcrap. You can't say that "oh, pluto makes a difference in astrological projections but the other bodies which have equal or greater mass that orbit the sun don't make a difference because we didn't have the technology to view them until recently.".
I mean, sure it's a pseudo science like creationism where you can make up the rules as you go along and don't have to worry about peer-review, but it should have some interior consistancy.